General Tech Good at troubleshooting? Have a non specific issue? Discuss general tech topics here...

Differences in SH-AWD versions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
ramee001's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Default Differences in SH-AWD versions?

Is there any difference in the SH-AWD used in the various Acura products? (Other than tuning differences).

Also, is SH-AWD still the "top dog" for AWD systems? I understand the new Evo has a torque vectoring system. xDrive and Quattro are working on it, but aren't available yet. Is this correct?

I do go skiing a lot (or like to think I do :-) and we do live in snow-prone country, so it is definitely something to consider.

We're looking to downsize our old MDX. Other half is partial to the RDX (cons: poor gas mileage), but we're also looking at the X3 (cons: expensive). I would also vaguely consider the Q5 or XC60, but I don't think they'll be out in time and they'll be really expensive anyways.
So, any "real-life" long-term reviews with the RDX or X3 would also be appreciated.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
AKinDen's Avatar
Regular Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 137
From: United States
Default

SH-AWD has changed over the years. In older cars like the prelude the SH-AWD was a system that distributed power to rear wheels only when they were slipping and only up to something like 40%. I'm not sure if the MDX or RDX has that type of system. I think you should consider the 09 TL SH-AWD! 3.7l V-6 305hp, true AWD system, cracks off a 0-60 in 5.5 seconds! Drive one it's awsome. should get around no prob in the snow.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95z115
MDX
1
Jan 6, 2013 09:52 PM
josh2140
Private For Sale/Trade Classifieds
1
Oct 5, 2012 12:00 PM
Buckster17
TL
3
Oct 5, 2012 07:17 AM
derek210
General Tech
2
Feb 19, 2011 08:24 PM
brave5213
RL
0
Oct 14, 2010 06:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.